back to the startRecent reviews

  • Written by JakeBlues on 17.05.2012

    One dollar.
    The entire, complicated and incredibly amusing plot revolves around a single dollar bill!

    There's no need to recap the story, as the movie quickly turned into a Christmas classic and a comedy classic as well, coming from the state of grace period that director John Landis had during the first half of the eighties (remember Animal House, An American Werewolf in London, The Blues Brothers, Coming to America?).

    State of grace that's extended here to the entire cast of actors appearing in the movie.

    Dan Aykroyd, in perfect physical shape a la Elwood Blues, is great as an arrogant w.a.s.p. yuppie in the first part of the film and even greater and funnier as a desperate tramp (his dirty, hungry and drunk version of Santa Klaus is probably the funniest in cinema history!)

    Eddie Murphy, playing a role that was originally written for the prematurely and tragically disappeared John Belushi, is equally entertaining.

    Then, there's the astounding beauty of Jamie Lee Curtis, whose nudities and smiles from this movie are simply unforgettable.

    It's also impossible not to mention three actors in non leading roles that really shine here: Denholm Elliott as Coleman, the perfect butler, Don Ameche and Ralph Bellamy as the evil tycoons, the brothers Duke.

    Finally, there's that unique vein of levity and madness that only John Landis at his best was able to create.
    The train scenes, for example, are pure Landis.

    There's nothing more to add: just sit down, relax, and enjoy this jem that is quintessentialy from the eighties and their edonistic spirit.

    And if you already saw the movie many times, you can watch it again and again with the same amount of enjoyment and laughs (this is another peculiarity of the best comedies from John Landis)!

  • Written by olympiquetango on 16.04.2012

    SPOILER!

    The Finnish space-satire was hitting trash movie fan hearts even before movie was taken. Let´s make a time travel. It is 1990 when a young group of movie nerds somewhere in Finland start creating a Star Wars parody. The mother of one nerd provides a room in her house for the project. Shootings start with a video-cam and an ancient green screen. The fighting effects are generated later on the computer in the kitchen of visual-effects-tinkerer Samuli Torssonen. Samuli and his comrade Timo Vuorensola already let the slowly growing internet community take part in their project; they allow them to comment on it and to bring in own ideas. When the group finally uploads Star Wreck: In the Pirkinning in 2005, it reaches millions of views.
    One year later director Timo Vourensola sits in the sauna with a friend and talks about a new story: after the end of WWII , Nazis flew to the dark side of the moon to settle down. In the year 2018 they wanna come back to conquer the Earth. There could be a “Meteor-Blitzkrieg” and a Nazi spaceship called “Götterdämmerung”. Udo Kier should be in that movie and the Slovenian industrial band Laibach- who like to perform in uniforms-could compose the score. What a trash! Six years later Iron Sky has its world premiere on the Berlinale 2012 in Berlin. The crazy idea turned into a 7,5 million Euro production. One tenth was contributed by the internet community. And even though being an independent production Iron Sky got more attention than a lot of blockbusters.
    What a success. Iron Sky already has a strong influence in seminars about viral marketing, crowd sourcing and crowd financing. A future audience helped pushing, designing and financing the movie. And Iron Sky shows again that you can make bucks with Nazis in pop culture. It is a product of a change in media, digitalization, and the potentiality of social media. Maybe this all helped convincing conventional subsidy to support this movie that sounded a lot like a “Naziploitation”. Maybe Quention Tarantino´s Inglourious Basterds (2009) also helped to pave the way for more utopist or dystopist interpretations of the Third Reich. You can certainly say “Chapeau!” for Timo Vuorensola´s stamina to finish this movie. BUT- is this a funny movie?
    Well, in my case I can only say, after years of waiting, I was disappointed a lot… “Moonnazis”- this word immediately triggers associations in your mind. Like a perfect Grindhouse trailer. But as full-length feature it runs out of steam. Iron Sky offers you perfectly animated space fights, a fondly designed swastika shaped moon base, “Reichsflugscheiben” (Nazi UFOs) and Nazi space suits. The technique is up to date, but the story is weirdly vintage and the humor is surprisingly gentle. While the Nazis in the movie are more or less comic characters (with only one main connection to their NS history- the Hitler salute) in steam punk fascist design with world-domination-image-neurosis, the US of A with a Sarah Palin lookalike female president and her evil genius PR assistant (longing for WWIII to ensure re-election) appear more like an arch-villain than the “Moonnazis”. In an Obama era this couple seems a bit outdated…
    To be acid-tongued Iron Sky lacks a connection to the present or to the real NS history. Maybe it just simply lacks of subversive diabolicalness. Instead the movie is full with references and quotes which makes it funny somehow but only because you already laughed about the originals…
    A priori the Finish-German-Australian co production lost during the long time period a lot of the anarchistic humor of the original idea. Iron Sky is professionalized to death- consensus jokes and an aesthetic appeal for the whole galaxy. This might rock the box office but definitely not the trash movie fans. Milky way mainstream… And in a world that is getting more and more extreme maybe a wrong message to the wrong people.

  • Written by bueno on 30.03.2012

    Not a lot of people know about this group of brithish comedians, but those who do know them like them quite a bit.

    They have made many movies in addition to their many sketches ans many espisode of their tv show "the flying circus", and they are all very very funny.

    And this movie is no exception, if you have a cristic sense this movie is one for your "must-see" pile.

    It is an umpredictable movie that has many key elements for the sucess achieved, such as knights, a round table, king arthur, terrible warriers in the forest,a monster, a wizard, even a little white bunny and so much more.

    The filming quality is quite good for qhen the movie was made (1975) so don´t go in expecting HD resolution only know you will find many funny things that will make you look for all the other movies from this bunch of guys.

    Don´t forget that you need an open mind to watch this and get ready for a lot of remarkable fun.

  • Written by Freudianspud on 22.03.2012

    I would like to begin this review by telling you that, prior to Rise of the Planet of the Apes, I had never seen a PotA movie. All I'd seen up until Rise was about ten minutes of the Tim Burton remake, and that was so bad that it scared me off the franchise.
    When Rise hit the theaters, I figured I'd give it another shot, since the trailer looked promising. In the end I didn't manage to see it at the cinema, but I did see the Blu-ray version, so I guess that's only one step down from the silver screen.

    The story is pretty straight-forward: a scientist by the name of Will Rodman (James Franco, 127 Hours) is working on a cure for Alzheimers, driven by the desire to cure his father Charles (John Lithgow, 3rd Rock From The Sun). Naturally, they test out the drugs on a number of apes. Their most favorite subject is Bright Eyes (An obvious homage to Heston's nickname in the original), but when a presentation goes wrong, the apes are put down.
    One apelet survives however, thanks to Will who takes it home and raises it. Soon enough, Will finds out that Caesar (Voiced by Andy Serkis, The Lord Of The Rings) is extremely intelligent. Will and Caesar become more than owner and pet, and when Caesar attacks a neighbor and is impounded, Will tries his best to free the ape from the horrible conditions he's put in.
    It's pretty obvious what happens for the rest of the film if you know the original, but I'll stop here, in case people haven't seen it yet.

    The story is basically a mirror image of the original film. I watched the original right after I saw Rise and there are a lot of similar moments, like when Heston/Caesar first speaks. There are some small references, some obvious, some less so, but overall it doesn't bother the film that it's basically the same story. It still adds elements that make it interesting enough to see, and as the story progresses I was actually getting more and more frightened by the rapidly evolving apes. Job well done!

    The acting in this movie is solid. James Franco does a good job and the supporting cast, including Lithgow, Tom Felton (The Harry Potter series), Tyler Labine (Tucker & Dale vs Evil), and Freida Pinto (Slumdog Millionaire), do a great job keeping the story going and making it believable.
    Of course, the real credit goes to the apes and their voice actors, lead by Serkis. I honestly couldn't tell at times when the noises were by real apes and when they were by the actors.

    The CGI is very impressive. I had to get used to the digital apes, but after a while you get used to it and you start to actually appreciate the detail they put into the creatures. Movement and expressions were very convincing to me personally, even when the apes started evolving and learning sign language by themselves. They keep the ape-like posture they need to be convincing.

    All in all, if you're a fan of the franchise I don't think you'll be disappointed. And if, like me, you haven't seen any of the films yet, this is a very decent way to get into them. My only tip is to stay away from the 2001 Tim Burton remake. I tried to watch it again after seeing Rise and the original, but I still couldn't make it to the end.
    What I would like to see is a remake that stays true to the source, but uses current make-up effects for the apes. Change nothing about the story, just give the look an update. I'd watch that film.

  • Written by fungus on 11.03.2012

    Well, what can I say? I finally managed to watch this cult and (already) classic movie. Thank's to a Bela Tarr retrospective in a Zurich cinema I could enjoy the the full 450 minutes in a cinema with another 100 people. Luckily, I got a place in one of the comfy sofas in the front and they served Hungarian goulash soup during the second intermission.
    The movie is about the collapse of a collective farm in Hungary near the end of Communism. They are expecting a large cash payment for the work of one year and plan to leave as soon as they have the money. Some plot against the others and try to leave with more than their share. However, when the smooth talking Irmias, whom they thought to be dead, returns everything changes. They willingly give all the money to Irmias for the hope that he somehow can keep the community going.
    My expectations were very high for this movie, since I wanted to watch it for quite some time, now. Fortunately, I wasn't disappointed. It took me about an hour to really get in the mood of the film but since then it was just like being in a world of it's own and I wasn't bored for a single minute. Yes, the movie is incredibly slow (the opening shot showing some cows lasts for almost nine minutes), but it is a strong way to show these monotone lives. Bela Tarr is not only a master of pictures but also of sounds. Most of the times I was amazed how much he told by only letting the right noises come from outside the picture range and repeating them over and over. Together with the slow camera movements and the minimalistic music by Mihály Vig the movie gets in some places hypnotic qualities. The movie also has a great cast. Peter Berling as the doctor is one of the best performances I ever saw in a movie. It was especially difficult for them, since it rains during almost the whole movie.
    All in all it just was a fantastic experience. The movie is a true masterpiece. 10/10

reviews written by